The Republican National Committee appears to have spent more than $150,000 to clothe and accessorize vice presidential candidate Sarah Palin and her family since her surprise pick by John McCain in late August.
According to financial disclosure records, the accessorizing began in early September and included bills from Saks Fifth Avenue in St. Louis and New York for a combined $49,425.74.
The records also document a couple of big-time shopping trips to Neiman Marcus in Minneapolis, including one $75,062.63 spree in early September.
The RNC also spent $4,716.49 on hair and makeup through September after reporting no such costs in August.
Politico asked the McCain campaign for comment, explicitly noting the $150,000 in expenses for department store shopping and makeup consultation that were incurred immediately after Palin’s announcement. Pre-September reports do not include similar costs.
Spokeswoman Maria Comella declined to answer specific questions about the expenditures, including whether it was necessary to spend that much and whether it amounted to one early investment in Palin or if shopping for the vice presidential nominee was ongoing.
“The campaign does not comment on strategic decisions regarding how financial resources available to the campaign are spent," she said.
The business of primping and dressing on the campaign trail has become fraught with political risk in recent years as voters increasingly see an elite Washington out of touch with their values and lifestyles.
In 2000, Democrat Al Gore took heat for changing his clothing hues. And in 2006, Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton (D-N.Y.) was ribbed for two hair styling sessions that cost about $3,000.
Then, there was Democrat John Edwards’ $400 hair cuts in 2007 and Republican McCain’s $520 black leather Ferragamo shoes this year.
A review of similar records for the campaign of Democrat Barack Obama and the Democratic National Committee turned up no similar spending.
But all the spending by other candidates pales in comparison to the GOP outlay for the Alaska governor whose expensive, designer outfits have been the topic of fashion pages and magazines.
What hasn’t been apparent is where the clothes came from – her closet back in Wasilla or from the campaign coffers in Washington.
The answer can be found inside the RNC’s September monthly financial disclosure report under “itemized coordinated expenditures.”
It’s a report that typically records expenses for direct mail, telephone calls and advertising. Those expenses do show up, but the report also has a new category of spending: “campaign accessories.”
September payments were also made to Barney’s New York ($789.72) and Bloomingdale’s New York ($5,102.71).
Macy’s in Minneapolis, another store fortunate enough to be situated in the Twin Cities that hosted last summer’s Republican National Convention, received three separate payments totaling $9,447.71.
The entries also show a few purchases at Pacifier, a top notch baby store, and Steiniauf & Stroller Inc., suggesting $295 was spent to accommodate the littlest Palin to join the campaign trail.
An additional $4,902.45 was spent at Atelier, a high-class shopping destination for men.
Source: http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1008/14805.html
Decleor
Replay
Antica Murrina Veneziana
But she's Joe sixpack. I know he doesn't spend that much on clothes.
1He sure doesn't -- and was that part of the tax payer contribution to the campaign.
2For clothes from Barney, Neiman, Saks etc, the items picked surely do not look as high end as the price suggests. Just saying...
The supporters shouldn't be paying for her families fashion buys; what she did not have $300 to pay for her son's items herself?
3That sure is a lot of people to clothe.
4That's what I was saying to my bf tonight. You know she knows how to bargain shop, with how she talks about spending money.
5Frankly, I'd rather spend my hard earned tax dollars on a homeless veteran (almost 1/2 our homeless population, at least)who can't find any support/break in sight than help Sarah Palin look good.
Good lord, she is campaigning in a presidential election. could we see the total of all of obama, michelle, biden and mrs. bidens wardrobe? Oh wait, the media isn't even looking into it. This is getting pathetic. Not you dream, but the media.
6Even citizen did a post a few months ago about biden and obama's designer suits and shoes.
7Yeah -- but are they paying for it with tax payers hard earned cash?? That's the only thing I care about. I can careless if you spend $50k of your own money.
8i just don't condone this. Taxpayer's $ shouldn't be spent like this...especially on the vice! I understand keeping up appearances during this important time period, but that kind of money is out of control. And especially inappropriate for the party that constantly attacks the other party for his intent to "hike taxes and spend all of our money"...is that not hipocracy? but then again, that's all politics seems to be lately, sigh...
9The issue isn't how much they are spending, the issue is WHO is paying for it. Plus the hypocrisy involved. She touts her self as the average every-woman but she sure as hell isn't living the life.
10Do you think she even sees these suits before they are laid out for her? Seriously guys, at this stage and level of the game, campaign people are behind the lay of every hair on all four of their heads.
11100% agreed. Which means that the campaign is responsible for simultaneously building up & tearing down her jane sixpack image.
12lol, Jane Sixpack
Good one.
And we supporters, we, lol jane sixpacks, know the reality of campaigning and that for a woman, this is part of it. Women are awful to other women. Look at poor Hilary and the crap she has gotten for her clothes. My feeling is, the less ammunition, the better. And the outrage about this seems to be coming from the side it doesn't even concern.
13Hey man, I'm not denying the reality of campaigning & I'm not dogging her clothes, I'd wear the vast majority of them, especially that pink jacket. I'm not really "outraged" about it either. I just think that vast amount of money directly contradicts her "every-woman" claim.
14I totally agree sasha! I mean most women don't buy all of their clothes at Saks and Neimans. I'm just saying. I like her wardrobe choices as well.
15I just hear -- that you can't use campaign contributions for personal use. So the McCain camp say they are going to give the clothes to charity -- but correct me if I'm wrong - they already broke the rules.
16*heard
17That's what it sounds like to me dream.
18"I just think that vast amount of money directly contradicts her "every-woman" claim."
19Couldn't agree with you more sashak. The media is jumping all over the contradiction. When you brand yourself one way and you don't keep the brand promise, people are going to call you out. Sure the other candidates wear expensive clothes, but they didn't brand themselves as hockey moms or as the average person. Pinning that argument on Obama doesn't work b/c people label him as an elitist. I don't like labels anyway!
Hear hear!
20Post A Comment
To post comments, please log in or register.